WhoshouldIsee Tracks
Search

Sustainability And The UK’s Spending Review

The UK’s 2025 Spending Review, unveiled by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, marks a pivotal moment for the nation’s journey towards Net Zero and broader sustainability goals. Coming at a critical juncture for both economic stability and climate action, the review outlines departmental budgets for day-to-day spending until 2029 and capital investment until 2030.

Spring Statement commitment to deliver infrastructure that is “environmentally sustainable and aligned with its long-term net zero ambitions” has been reiterated with a clear emphasis on “investing in Britain’s renewal: its security, health and economy.”

Within this overarching ambition, the climate and environmental agenda features prominently, albeit with a discernible leaning towards certain sectors and approaches.

A significant takeaway is the strong commitment to clean energy infrastructure, a core pillar of the UK’s aspiration to become a “clean energy superpower.” The review confirms substantial allocations, including £14.2 billion for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant, signalling a renewed confidence in large-scale nuclear as a foundational low-carbon electricity source. Further investment of £2.5 billion is earmarked for the Small Modular Reactor (SMR) program, with Rolls-Royce identified as a preferred partner, aiming for the first SMRs to connect to the grid by the mid-2030s. Nuclear fusion technology also receives a notable boost of over £2.5 billion, supporting the development of a prototype energy plant in Nottinghamshire. These investments underscore a strategy to diversify the energy mix and enhance energy security, reducing reliance on volatile international fossil fuel markets.

Beyond nuclear, the review affirms £8.3 billion in funding for Great British Energy (GB Energy), a manifesto commitment designed to foster clean power projects. An additional £300 million is specifically allocated to bolster offshore wind supply chains, including up to £80 million for port investment to support floating offshore wind deployment in Port Talbot, Wales. This signals a continued, though perhaps less aggressive than some hoped, backing for established renewable technologies, aiming to secure domestic jobs and manufacturing capabilities.

Carbon Capture, Usage, and Storage (CCUS) projects also receive significant backing, with £9.4 billion allocated to support industrial clusters such as East Coast and HyNet. This investment is crucial for decarbonising heavy industries and managing emissions from hard-to-abate sectors, reflecting the government’s recognition of CCUS as an indispensable technology for achieving Net Zero. However, details regarding funding timelines and broader scope for other potential clusters remain somewhat less clear, indicating a phased approach.

On the demand side, the review maintains the £13.2 billion commitment to the Warm Homes Plan (covering 2025-26 to 2029-30). This crucial initiative aims to improve household energy efficiency, facilitate the rollout of heat pumps, and support the adoption of solar panels and batteries, with the government projecting potential savings of up to £600 per household. This funding represents a substantial increase compared to previous government commitments and is vital for decarbonising heating and reducing energy bills, aligning with the “Future Homes Standard” that will mandate low-carbon heating and high energy efficiency in almost all new homes.

The 2025 UK Spending Review also signals a strategic intent for public sector sustainability and Net Zero, albeit primarily through broader decarbonisation initiatives rather than explicit, ring-fenced funds solely for public estate greening. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) sees a significant 16% increase in overall departmental spending by 2028-29, indicating a governmental focus on energy transition that will undoubtedly impact public sector operations and infrastructure.

A notable commitment is the £2.6 billion capital investment to decarbonise transport, including £1.4 billion for accelerating electric vehicle uptake (including vans and HGVs used by public services) and £400 million for charging infrastructure. This directly supports the greening of public sector fleets and wider public transport systems, exemplified by significant grants for city regions like Greater Manchester’s electric bus network.

While direct large-scale funding for retrofitting public buildings isn’t explicitly detailed as a separate head, the emphasis on “zero-based review” across government departments, aiming for efficiency and productivity improvements, suggests that sustainability considerations may be integrated into operational spending decisions. Investments in digital transformation and AI across public services, including the NHS, could indirectly contribute to reduced resource consumption and improved efficiency.

However, departmental budgets for day-to-day spending face tough choices. While some departments, like Health and Local Government, see real-terms increases, others face cuts. This could necessitate leveraging existing budgets and seeking private sector partnerships to advance decarbonisation within public sector estates and services, beyond the centrally driven energy and transport initiatives. The review, therefore, sets a framework where public sector decarbonisation will likely be achieved through a combination of targeted capital injections, efficiency drives, and a broader strategic shift towards clean energy.

However, in assessing the review’s sustainability credentials, we must also consider areas that might receive less direct attention or face budgetary pressures. While there is a welcome investment of £4.2 billion over three years for flood defences, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) may face budget cuts, which could limit its capacity to address broader environmental resilience challenges. Funding for nature restoration appears primarily linked to agricultural schemes, with a £30 million uplift in Higher Level Stewardship payments from January 2025 to farmers for nature-friendly practices. The new Planning & Infrastructure Bill 2025 also introduces a Nature Restoration Levy, funded by developer contributions, intended to support strategic nature recovery. While these are positive steps, some environmental groups might view the overall scale of investment in biodiversity and ecosystem restoration as less ambitious than energy infrastructure.

Overall, the 2025 Spending Review signals a clear strategic direction for the UK’s Net Zero transition, heavily emphasising energy security through nuclear and carbon capture technologies, alongside continued investment in renewables and household energy efficiency, although once again, overt support for redevelopment of commercial buildings is notably absent. The significant capital allocations are intended to stimulate private investment and create green jobs. However, the true impact on achieving the UK’s ambitious Net Zero targets by 2050 will depend not only on the allocated funds but also on the efficiency of their deployment, the coherence of supporting policies, and the government’s ability to navigate the complex interplay between economic growth and environmental stewardship.

The review’s success will ultimately be judged by its ability to deliver tangible, sustained progress across all pillars of the sustainability agenda, ensuring a just and effective transition for the entire nation. For those supporting the built environment, from design and specification to installation, the spending review does reiterate the importance of incorporating social value through environmental improvement, especially within the public sector, even when projects are not directly related to sustainability. 

More about Net Zero and sustainable hot water